Classic project management is characterized by three models: Stage-Gate-Model, Waterfall-Model and the V-Model with the agency-specific adaptation V-Model XT Bund. WuWIT is familiar with all of these models and the team has already used them several times.
The biggest advantages of these models are the high degree of structure, high planning reliability and control over the progress of the project.
The disadvantages are the lack of flexibility, lack of iterations and high effort/cost.

Agile methods are flexible and versatile, and the basic principle underlying all of them is the interactive approach. In each interaction, at least one deliverable product increment is to be completed. The cycles are very short compared to the classic method and thus allow flexible adjustments when requirements change. Scrum and Kanban are two of the most important agile methods in the agile world. If you look at the CHAOS report of the Standish Group, the classic project management models come off very poorly compared to the agile methods. The success rate of agile projects is much higher and accordingly the failure rate of the classic models is worse. Some studies see agility as a competitive advantage because the more agile a company is, the better the financial key figures.

Hybrid project management combines classic and agile methodologies along with other management systems. However, hybrid operations depend not only on the roles used, but also on the working time models. Often a strict separation is not at all useful, but the combination of different methodologies can be more promising. The method therefore tries to combine the best of both worlds, because it is often due to a lack of follow-through in the organization and the management that they do not align themselves in an agile way.